Menu
The New Contemporary Art Magazine

Silviu and Irina Székley’s Kalaidescopic Collages

Self-taught Romanian collage artists Silviu and Irina Székley consider their works to be “conceptual spontaneities” that distort familiar images into new, transfigured realities. The duo takes traditional images, especially 19th century masterpieces and shatters our expectations through unorthodox manipulation. As the artists say themselves, “Our approach to art is very naïve, ludic and hazardous.”

Self-taught Romanian collage artists Silviu and Irina Székley consider their works to be “conceptual spontaneities” that distort familiar images into new, transfigured realities. The duo takes traditional images, especially 19th century masterpieces and shatters our expectations through unorthodox manipulation. As the artists say themselves, “Our approach to art is very naïve, ludic and hazardous.”

In their related series “Manipulations” and “Circollage,” classical images are cut up and re-assembled- whether systemically, as in “Circollage” or through blasted reiteration, as in “Manipulations,” the pair communicates an eccentric mood. “What inspires us is the movement of unknown images, which blur the objects we think we know.” Along this vein, their works often appear eerie and unnatural- recognizable figures are de-familiarized through their often abrasive neo-Dadaist lens.

Deeply affected by their strong backgrounds in critical theory and philosophy, the Székleys say, “Each individual existence is a distortion in itself, an alteration of the original shape of the building blocks of life. From this point of view, we are fundamentally behaving like a moving image… ultimately we are a mere optical illusion experienced by another moving image.” In other words, they are simply deconstructing our already distorted reality in their complex collages.

While one might be tempted to apply a meaning or an ideology to their collages because of this, the artists resist the notion of art as predetermined: “We do not attach any predetermined aims or meanings to our works. The work happens to emerge and develop into its own existence… We believe that art is not art if it doesn’t generate certain forms of misrepresentation, confusion, anger or sarcasm.”

Meta
Share
Facebook
Reddit
Pinterest
Email
Related Articles
Chilean artist Alvaro Tapia finds something sinister even in his most innocent subjects. His portrait illustrations feature friends, famous people, artists and others he admires. What lurks beneath the surface in these subjects — something grotesque and often evil — is what most attracts the artist. The end result, however, is far from ugly. Bursting with color and life, his portraits are high-impact. Tapia arranges contrasting colors, vector lines and geometric shapes so that they vibrate off one another. His subjects not only seem alive but ready to jump off the page right at the viewer’s throat.
Chris Berens brings his distinctive blend of painting and collage to Jaski Gallery in Amsterdam with the show “Feniks." Among these new works is a massive "Crowning Glory," for which the artist constructed a handmade wooden frame. (Berens was featured in the “Turn the Page: The First Ten Years of Hi-Fructose” exhibition.) "Feniks" kicks off on Dec. 7 and runs through Dec. 22.
Berlin-based artist Pierre Schmidt's work floats freely between illustration and collage, traditional and digital. The artist splices vintage photographs of well-groomed ladies and gentlemen that evoke the standards of 20th-century propriety, turning them into bastions of surreal visions. In one piece, a cranium is cut open and in another, a face lifts off the head, implying a sort of out-of-body, psychedelic experience. Schmidt's drawings flow as freely and impulsively as doodles, with lots of frenetic line work reigned in by the geometric organization of each piece. Each piece a veritable mind trip, his work speaks to the day dreamers among us.
Dallas, Texas based artist Michael Reeder paints eclectic portraits that explore ideas about identity. Reeder is fascinated by the various characteristics that define us, and his works mix those elements both stylistically and conceptually. While his main interest is modern identity, the figures he portrays often have a classical quality. He renders their faces as if he were chiseling away at marble, redefined with abstract and exaggerated features with blank eyes (ancient statue eyes were painted or inlaid.) His portraits aren't meant to be accurate representations. Rather, he considers portraiture to be more like a reinvention of his subjects, which takes place at their simplest form. 

Subscribe to the Hi-Fructose Mailing List