Menu
The New Contemporary Art Magazine

Close Encounters: The Paintings of David Rice

The Pacific Northwest is perhaps the wildest, most breathtaking region in the continental United States. With its combination of mountain ranges, conifer forests, lakes, rivers, and ancient sequoias looming over the California coast, the geography and texture of Wyoming, Montana, California, and Oregon return us to North America’s primordial past. It reminds us of when the natural world had infinite scope, infinite variety, and a magisterial beauty that was precisely what the Romanticist painters and poets had in mind when they thought of the overpowering majesty and terror of the sublime. How else to explain the feeling one gets when the senses are under siege by an ocean, blankets of green forest, ice-capped mountain peaks, and a big blue canvas sky, all bunched together like some eclectic, densely packed diorama? If there is one place for nature to inspire an American artist, it is surely in the Northwestern U.S.

David Rice grew up near Aspen, Colorado, the son of a ski instructor. From an early age, he loved the natural world. “There’s something about it,” Rice says. “I like the idea that we [animals and humans] get to share space together. You can do it in a way where we don’t affect each other.”

Rice has always been enthralled by being in the living presence of a wild animal, and explains how life in Colorado, Oregon, and time spent at Yellowstone National Park has afforded him the opportunity to capture what he describes as the “magic” of catching sight of bighorn sheep, bobcat, fox, and elk. He’s seen some of North America’s big game in and around Yellowstone, and the rural town he grew up in in Colorado was accustomed to black bears ambling through the community, napping in the trees during the day like languorous beasts from children’s books. It’s this peaceful, provincial coexistence that informs many of Rice’s paintings, which, in their depiction of North American wildlife, suggest a tender, fragile humanity.

The inception stage for Rice often begins with photography. He’ll go outside with his DSLR camera and shoot whatever fragments of wilderness he comes across, whether it is a “barren landscape” or a “weird angle” that gives him a novel vantage into the contours of nature. He then uses these photographic references as the early framework for his sketches and, ultimately, his paintings. For Rice, seeing animals in the wild is critical to his artistic process. “[It’s important] to understand how they move, see where their joints are.” But glimpsing iconic North American creatures like the bald eagle, red fox, and mountain lion, animals entrenched in centuries of American mythos and Native American folklore, is more than just a means to anatomical accuracy. “Being able to see [these animals] in real life is what makes it important or seem like more than just [for example] deer: you see that deer, that specific one. You don’t just group it into that category of deer. That connection is kind of the whole reasoning behind what I do.”

Rice discusses the magic of seeing an animal in the wild, the ineffable electricity of locking eyes with a big cat, a moose, a brown bear. It wouldn’t be a stretch to suggest that much of Rice’s work, and perhaps the foremost raison d’être of his art in general, grows out of those private, isolated moments where humans and wild animals lock eyes, for a brief moment mutually acknowledging the swirling maelstrom of curiosity, trepidation, and awe behind those eyes. It’s a very specific, fleeting sort of magic, when the chasm between species briefly but rapidly closes, and you feel yourself temporarily tangled up in the inner life of another living thing. It’s the interloper’s magic.

After collecting enough reference photos, from both his own shooting outdoors and wildlife photography from publications like National Geographic, he’ll pull all the images together and “frankenstein” them in Photoshop.

When he’s stitched together a rough approximation he’s satisfied with, he starts sketching from that amalgamated reference image. He builds his backgrounds with multiple coats of paint to achieve the layered texture apparent in much of his work. He deliberately allows earlier coats to “poke through” to give the wallpaper the tattered, threadbare aesthetic he’s fond of. After that comes the animal subject of the composition, followed by the “embellishments” that he says “help to emphasize the enchanting quality a lot of paintings possess.”

Rice explains on his website that his paintings endow his subjects with “personifying characteristics.” Elaborating on this, he discusses how through shrouding wildlife in cloaks and shawls he is trying to exalt them, giving them “nobility” and a sort of “higher existence.”

In “Close Encounter,” a 24″ x 36″ piece originally shown at Rice’s Two Creeks solo show at Antler Gallery in Portland, an imperious big horn sheep saunters toward the center of the frame, adorned in a red shawl. The work is paradigmatic of the nobility Rice aspires to bestow on North American fauna: moving away from the rest of the herd, this ram is elevated and individualized, the arresting grandeur of his spiraling horns given pride of place against the fraying wallpaper background.

“Close Encounter” and other Rice paintings earn their distinctiveness by stopping just short of anthropomorphizing. The viewer does not imagine that these animals could talk, trick, play poker, or fret over a pocket watch. They are not the enchanted creatures from fairy tales and fables, which are, despite their charm, wit, and preternatural abilities, primarily instruments of human protagonists. Rice’s subjects stand on their own hooves, paws, and talons—they are not subjugated or overtly stylized to satisfy aesthetic desires.

However, Rice still subtly incorporates human trappings into his work, whether through vibrant fabrics, geometric patterns, or ornate wallpaper backgrounds, the latter of which evoke a kind of animal regalia. While Rice says he chooses the “faded wallpaper” backgrounds to distinguish his compositions from more traditional landscape painting, the effect is actually to reinforce the often invisible ubiquity of the natural world: “The patterns are used in an attempt to show a link between human and nature. Patterns created by man are often directly inspired by patterns found in nature.” It’s worth noting that the floral-patterned wallpaper in some of Rice’s paintings feels like a distant cousin to the rich, rococo wallpapers found in the work of Kehinda Wiley. Wiley may be grappling with much different themes than Rice—race, identity politics, and a sort of ironic usurpation of Old Masters portraits—but the effect of the backgrounds are not entirely unrelated. Rice’s wan yet still florid designs have the effect of re-contextualizing the subjects, forcing the viewer to think of a golden eagle, a peregrine falcon or an elk bull as potent forces of personality, no less worthy of tribute and glorification than historical heroes and military leaders.

One again risks the pitfalls of anthropomorphizing, but Rice’s work seems determined to respect the mysterious individualism of wildlife.

I like the idea that we [animals and humans] get to share space together. You can do it in a way where we don’t affect each other.”

Patterns created by man are often directly inspired by patterns found in nature.”

“Roost” is a fine example of this compelling balance. A bald eagle and a golden eagle share an intricate nest of gnarled sticks. Upon closer examination, the nest is strewn with bright blue fabric, red thread, and colorful arrows. These probably qualify as the embellishments of enchantment Rice describes, and they add to the slightly fantastical quality of the nest itself, which weaves and bends with impossible plasticity, like a sinister thicket in a magical forest.

The floral wallpaper only adds to the whimsical quality of the painting, leading the viewer to contemplate the eagles in a new way—to consider their style, grace, and swagger, even. In the painting one hears echoes of Rice’s remark that what we perceive as man-made patterns are in fact most often patterns from nature: The wallpaper itself is not necessarily a “human element.” It’s also a nature painting within a nature painting; although we automatically associate blossoming flowers with textile patterns, they are, first and foremost, humans endeavoring to capture nature in art.

With a show coming up in the spring, Rice has recently begun contemplating new directions for his work. He says he wants to incorporate more narrative into his paintings, experiment with figurative subjects, and grapple with mankind’s footprint in the natural world. From a technical standpoint, works like “Refuge” and “Gather” hint at rich, stylized brushwork, drawing from a mix of graphic novel chiaroscuro and the opulent textures of Post Impressionism. His illustrations and sketches suggest tantalizing new thematic avenues as well, including the moral and political dimensions of endangered wildlife, diminishing habitats, and man-made natural disasters like oil spills. Imagine an artist with Rice’s compassion and facility for wildlife portraits tackling the tragic/iconic image of the brown pelican after the BP oil spill, wings drenched in claycolored toxic sludge and emblematic of the malignant side of man overlapping with nature. When I spoke with Rice we discussed how much of a shame it was that there isn’t a word besides “humanize” to describe what he is trying to illustrate by revealing the grace, mystery, and gentle charisma behind individual animals (that deer). While there may not yet be a word that adequately expresses this specific artistic undertaking, there is no doubt that the world is full of wildlife under circumstances that not only elicit profound sympathy but also ask that we recognize their very real and very embattled inner lives. A world that Rice is uniquely suited to illuminate in his art.*

This article originally appeared in Hi-Fructose Issue 39, which is sold out. Get  our latest print issue by subscribing to Hi-Fructose here. 

Meta
Share
Facebook
Reddit
Pinterest
Email
Related Articles
Yellena James explores a wildly flourishing imaginary ecosystem in her solo show "Radiance," opening at LeQuiVive Gallery in Oakland on January 10. While paintings of flowers are traditionally on the tame side, James's work is far-removed from your average still life. Her flat, stylized flora explodes from every corner of each piece. The brightly colored, biomorphic shapes are ambiguous and suggestive, sometimes even overwhelmingly energetic. James draws and paints them in combinations of acrylic, marker, and ink, inviting a playful dance of various textures. "Radiance" will include a site-specific mural at the gallery, as well.
“The world I build has no constraint, no logic. Everything is possible,” says Pontiroli. “My objective is to shake our imagination by developing a universe based on the absurd and the senseless.” Read the full article on the artist by clicking above!
For artist Sarah Slappey, the body is both subject and setting. It entrances and repels, can be beautiful and grotesque. Above all, it is a means of artistic exploration that defies neat categorization. Read the full article by clicking above.
While Billy Norrby's previous work was soft and airy, evoking the Romanticist paintings of the 18th century, his latest series flashes forward a few centuries to a dystopian future that calls to mind the film Bladerunner or cult science fiction author Phillip K. Dick's book covers. Norrby says he found inspiration in 1970s pulp sci-fi novels, vintage Soviet space race propaganda, and special effects from movies such as 2001. Titled "Pulsar," some of the pieces in the new series will appear next at Jonathan LeVine Gallery in New York in August. Norrby just shared some images from this body of work with us. Check it out below.

Subscribe to the Hi-Fructose Mailing List